Hearing on Allegations of GSA Misconduct: Braley Questions

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform holds a hearing: “Allegations of Misconduct at the General Services Administration.” The hearing inquires about allegations that GSA Administrator Lurita Doan failed to follow proper procedures for awarding federal contracts, attempted to intervene in contract negotiations, and engaged in partisan political activities on federal property. Rep. Braley questions gsa head Doan on a political briefing given at GSA headquarters.

Duration : 0:10:7


Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

25 Responses to “Hearing on Allegations of GSA Misconduct: Braley Questions”

  1. cbraley2008

    i think i might be …
    i think i might be related to him?

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  2. mkl62

    Braley needs to go. …
    Braley needs to go. And he’s not the only one. The Democrats and Republicans have had a stranglehold on this country for too long. It’s time for a third party. Independent, Libertarian, it doesn’t matter. ROSS PEROT FOREVER!!!!!!!

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  3. WashMitt

    Nancy Pelosi who …
    Nancy Pelosi who quietly agreed to strip out of the $100 billion funding bill for Iraq a provision that would have required President Bush to seek congressional approval before launching any new war on Iran.

    Because AIPAC asked her to.

    She is a traitor

    watch?v=iWLBhgTQ46o

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  4. philly1537

    whos in the blue …
    whos in the blue what a crack whore

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  5. 1yK3Y4

    She needs to learn …
    She needs to learn how to lie. Nancy, teach her.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  6. trfootball48

    you have no …
    you have no clue liberal trash

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  7. WashMitt

    Nancy Pelosi who …
    Nancy Pelosi who quietly agreed to strip out of the $100 billion funding bill for Iraq a provision that would have required President Bush to seek congressional approval before launching any new war on Iran.

    Because AIPAC asked her to.

    She is a traitor

    watch?v=iWLBhgTQ46o

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  8. flobbledeefleeb

    Just like Alberto …
    Just like Alberto Gonzales, she always says that she doesn’t remember any of the events in question. Republicans somehow believe them when they blackout and have amnesia exactly when unethical acts are committed at their jobs.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  9. davemartin7777

    Republicans wet …
    Republicans wet dream is of American dominated politically and economically by large corporations… it’s a form of fascism and it’s called Corporcracy.

    This woman is Bush’s example of a leader.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  10. cerealboxconspiracy

    It makes look like …
    It makes look like even more of a liar and jackass when she answers like that.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  11. zwecklosigkeit

    why are these …
    why are these interviewers letting her get away with her non-answers, or her snarky ones? this woman should be a sobbing, snotty, disgusting mess at her desk. you appreciate our interpretation of this? you have a different interpretation? are you actually a paid member of the department of the gsa? i hate you, congress.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  12. zwecklosigkeit

    republicans should …
    republicans should have their voters rights revoked.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  13. Yankhadenough

    For God’s sake , …
    For God’s sake , people, google then read PNAC. America is being run into the ground by the Neocon Manifesto. Impeach the vile bastards already!

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  14. briguy01

    I’m not talking …
    I’m not talking about Saddam. I’m speaking about the potentially impeachable Bush crimes.

    Changing subjects, Saddam was to sell oil to France, Germany and Russia—only—while switching to the Euro. This only provides a motive to powerful oil interests within (and linked to) the Bush administration for attacking Hussein to secure PSA’s (profit sharing agreements) the current benchmarks for leaving Iraq.

    It certainly does not look good for our current administration. That is clear.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  15. briguy01

    lt5lee
    <<<What is …

    lt5lee
    <<<What is your definition of denial?… False accusations?>>>

    Just what are some of this administrations crimes for which several people could be impeached? READ ON BELOW..

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  16. briguy01

    Lying to the …
    Lying to the American people about WMD.

    Starting a preemptive war based on lies for political gain and profit – Attacking a sovereign nation

    Revealing CIA covert operatives

    The CIA brought charges against W’s administration and won convictions against “Scooter” Libby for lying about participating in the leak.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  17. briguy01

    Picking and …
    Picking and choosing what legislation he will enforce through “writing statements”

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  18. briguy01

    According to …
    According to conservative Republican Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of Treasury under President Ronald Reagan, dubbed the “Father of Reaganomics,” Bush has worked to take away habeas corpus and to dismantle the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. Terrorists are not anything like the threat that we face to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution from our own government—our own President—in the name of fighting terrorism.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  19. briguy01

    Bush claims …
    Bush claims authority within a foreign nation to extract someone secretly, render them to a third nation for torture then lock them away forever without a trial or any evidence ever having to be produced. Not even Tiberius Caesar would do this to Jesus Christ. He and people of his day were at least given the privilege of a mock trial.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  20. ViperX83

    Warrantless …
    Warrantless wiretapping is a direct violation of the 4th amendment. Holding people without charge or access to council and without hope of such, for several years, is a direct violation of the 5th and 6th amendments. Torturing people, including, but not limited to, waterboarding, extreme sensory disturbance or deprivation to the point of inducing psychosis, and many other such techniques, violate the 8th amendment (to say nothing of the geneva conventions).

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  21. ViperX83

    Violated the 4th, …
    Violated the 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th amendments for a start.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  22. xblade753

    Il y’a 14 ans une …
    Il y’a 14 ans une jeune fille venais de fêter son anniversaire mais quand tout à coup un jeune homme l’étrangla maintenant que vous aver lu se message un esprit viendra vous voir toute les nuits? sauf si vous suiver ces instruction :
    Reecrire ce message dans trois autre vidéo

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  23. briguy01

    Fascinating: When W …
    Fascinating: When W is accused of crimes his supporters point to Clinton then say W did no wrong. When Clinton was accused of a crime, his supporters admitted Clinton’s character defects but did not deem them State business. Even though W’s alleged crimes are felonies or treasonous, his supporters deny the importance of the accusations and potential harm done to the US. Nevertheless in the next election, Dems will be accused of being soft on crime. Totally fascinating how denial works.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  24. drsteevo

    Sorry lt5lee, I am …
    Sorry lt5lee, I am not going to argue such an obvious point with someone as idiotic as yourself. If you really believe GWB hasn’t violated the US Constitution, then you are either a liar, or a total moron. My bet is a little bit of both.

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am
  25. drsteevo

    Are you on drugs or …
    Are you on drugs or something? Wake up and read about GWB, he is a war criminal and has violated the constitution numerous times. What is really scary is we don’t know most of what is going on…

    November 29th, 2009 | 11:08 am

Leave a Reply