<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow-Up Hearing on GSA Misconduct: Clay&#8217;s Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions</link>
	<description>We Can Get You Approved</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:14:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avidsh21</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Avidsh21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-236</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Oh brainless GOP ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Oh brainless GOP drone, Dems don&#039;t have teeth for attacks.  Here is a woman who has abused her office to benefit your party and corporate contributors. Listen to how she badmouths her staff who testified about her. Who&#039;s attacking whom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Oh brainless GOP &#8230;</b> <br /> Oh brainless GOP drone, Dems don&#8217;t have teeth for attacks.  Here is a woman who has abused her office to benefit your party and corporate contributors. Listen to how she badmouths her staff who testified about her. Who&#8217;s attacking whom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffakr</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>ffakr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-237</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Interrogation ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Interrogation process?  From the party that brought back torture?  Lying Bitch.  Her argument is, if I put in a hypothetical qualifier I can smear my subordinates.. but I can come back and claim I never did it.  It&#039;s &quot;possible&quot; she&#039;s a lying bitch.  hows that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Interrogation &#8230;</b> <br /> Interrogation process?  From the party that brought back torture?  Lying Bitch.  Her argument is, if I put in a hypothetical qualifier I can smear my subordinates.. but I can come back and claim I never did it.  It&#8217;s &#8220;possible&#8221; she&#8217;s a lying bitch.  hows that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gocelts</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>gocelts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-238</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Somebody needs to ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Somebody needs to slap this lying bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Somebody needs to &#8230;</b> <br /> Somebody needs to slap this lying bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quicksite</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>quicksite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-239</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&quot;Attack Operation&quot; ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; &quot;Attack Operation&quot; . Oh no, no, no. That won&#039;t do. It&#039;s needs a suitable graphics-package for TV. Try this: Democratic Jihad Against Public Servants. Or &quot;Showdown: Who&#039;s Overseeing the Overseers? By Bill O&#039;Reilly&quot;. Those play much better to an ignorant crowd. Don&#039;t you think? You need a better hook. Throw in some Fox NILFs to shake their heads in lusty disgust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>&#8220;Attack Operation&#8221; &#8230;</b> <br /> &#8220;Attack Operation&#8221; . Oh no, no, no. That won&#8217;t do. It&#8217;s needs a suitable graphics-package for TV. Try this: Democratic Jihad Against Public Servants. Or &#8220;Showdown: Who&#8217;s Overseeing the Overseers? By Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8221;. Those play much better to an ignorant crowd. Don&#8217;t you think? You need a better hook. Throw in some Fox NILFs to shake their heads in lusty disgust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g699a</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>g699a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-240</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Let&#039;s see, just who ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Let&#039;s see, just who is it who is testifiing here, Clay? This isn&#039;t a hearing. This isn&#039;t OVERSIGHT. This is juat more Democratic UNDERCUT. The Democrats have been using Tax Payer monies for their attack operation for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Let&#8217;s see, just who &#8230;</b> <br /> Let&#8217;s see, just who is it who is testifiing here, Clay? This isn&#8217;t a hearing. This isn&#8217;t OVERSIGHT. This is juat more Democratic UNDERCUT. The Democrats have been using Tax Payer monies for their attack operation for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puu1111</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>puu1111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-232</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Typical lying ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Typical lying fake-christian republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Typical lying &#8230;</b> <br /> Typical lying fake-christian republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katygirl48</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>katygirl48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-233</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;This woman typifies ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; This woman typifies everything that is wrong with the Bush Regime: arrogance, disdain for everyone save herself and her toadies, refusal to accept responsibility for matters under her control, distortion of facts, using smear tactics against others and revenge on those who &quot;cross&quot; her. What a narcissist!!!  If Ms. Doan is a &quot;public servant,&quot; then God help us all!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This woman typifies &#8230;</b> <br /> This woman typifies everything that is wrong with the Bush Regime: arrogance, disdain for everyone save herself and her toadies, refusal to accept responsibility for matters under her control, distortion of facts, using smear tactics against others and revenge on those who &#8220;cross&#8221; her. What a narcissist!!!  If Ms. Doan is a &#8220;public servant,&#8221; then God help us all!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eggnoggerino</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>eggnoggerino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-234</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;G669A! The brave ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; G669A! The brave defender of corruption! Don&#039;t you understand that this is not so much about partisanship, but about the &#039;health&#039; of the USA political system? And why always point the fingers at Clinton and the democrats??? Corruption is bad on either side. Unfortunately the republicans turn out to be a much more ruthless bunch than the democrats. 
And Bush promised to &#039;clean up Washington&#039; ... well done ... not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>G669A! The brave &#8230;</b> <br /> G669A! The brave defender of corruption! Don&#8217;t you understand that this is not so much about partisanship, but about the &#8216;health&#8217; of the USA political system? And why always point the fingers at Clinton and the democrats??? Corruption is bad on either side. Unfortunately the republicans turn out to be a much more ruthless bunch than the democrats.<br />
And Bush promised to &#8216;clean up Washington&#8217; &#8230; well done &#8230; not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g699a</title>
		<link>http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions/comment-page-1#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>g699a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsaapprovalsite.com/gsa/follow-up-hearing-on-gsa-misconduct-clays-questions#comment-235</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;My party? FOX? You ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; My party? FOX? You both clearly do not deal in facts. Your &quot;indictments&quot; are pull out of thin air! How can you come to conclusions, like this, without knowing the facts? Oh, I forgot, you are probibly liberal Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>My party? FOX? You &#8230;</b> <br /> My party? FOX? You both clearly do not deal in facts. Your &#8220;indictments&#8221; are pull out of thin air! How can you come to conclusions, like this, without knowing the facts? Oh, I forgot, you are probibly liberal Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

